然后,我们比较了两种方案的复杂性。首先,我们比较了计算复杂度为入学deci -

“锡安。CSY8的复杂性就一个入学deci -

锡,取决于Nyuod缓存的大小历史使用关于可移动性的估计。图2显示的平均数字

sunmations数值操作(如和乘法)和比较用于入学的决定。为CSY8有限公司,iziqt = 1(最简单的情况下使用)。而有一个重要的CSY8 com -plexity开销,道具只需要一个操作和比较-ison为入学的决定。-We then compared the complexity of　the two schemes. First, we

compared　the　computational　complexity　for an admission deci-

sion. The complexity of CSY8 with respect　to an　admission deci-

sion depends on Nyuod,　which is　the size of　the cached history used

for mobility estimation. Fig.　2a　shows　the average numbers　of

numerical operations (i.e.　sunmations　and　multiplications) and

comparisons used　for an admission decision. For CSY8, iziqt,lLc,　= 1

was　used　(the　simplest case). While CSY8　has a　significant　com-

plexity overhead, PROP required only one operation and compar-

ison for an admission decision.